Law In Motion -5 Classification of Offences
Law
In Motion -5
Classification
of Offences
Having briefly seen the outlines of law and how to report
to the police, it would be pertinent to look at a simplistic but legal
classification of offences. There are various methods of classification of offences:
1.
Offences under Local Laws
2.
Offences under Special Laws
3.
Classification based on seriousness of the
offences - Cognizability
4.
Classification on the basis of bail
provisions
1. Local Laws (LL)
-
Offences
can be defined/categorised for certain local areas i.e., geographical
boundaries. These geographical
boundaries can be countries or provinces or specific areas. Thus, the Dowry
Prohibition Act, Sati Act, Child Marriage Restraint Act etc., are legislations which are applicable only in
India and are also SL enacted for the purpose. However, provisions of
Indian Penal Code (IPC) like Section
498A Husband or relative of husband
of a woman subjecting her to cruelty make offences punishable
throughout the country. Some of these offences may not have a similar
definition or parallels elsewhere in the world although similar acts may be
punishable in general terms.
Then
there are cases where some state
governments have carried out State level amendments in the IPC to make certain
provisions more stringent than the original ones in IPC. These are also usually
applicable locally for offences committed within the territorial boundaries of
that State e.g., Section 103 (Fifthly) added by Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh
(although provisions are a bit different in meaning). Similarly Haryana has
incorporated Sections 379A and 379B for dealing with snatching and categorised
these as aggravated offences.
LL could also be defined in applicability in
certain regions only – Liquor Prohibition Laws in some states
like Nagaland, Bihar, Gujarat, etc are
only applicable there not elsewhere. Moreover, the definition of offences of what is permissible or prohibited may also
vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, widely. The Nagaland Security
Regulations (NSR) are only applicable for offences committed within the
territory of Nagaland, unless the conspiracy angle is there in which case,
conspirators outside Nagaland may also get into trouble. Similarly, the Punjab
Excise Act is applicable in Punjab only – although Himachal and Haryana have
also adopted it.
State specific amendments may also be
incorporated in SL to either fill in the gaps or make more stringent provisions
or incorporate additional things – e.g., in the Disaster
Management Act, various states incorporated new regulations or notifications to
make the use of masks etc., mandatory during COVID-19 pandemic. State level
changes can also be made in other laws like Motor
Vehicles Act e.g., quantum of minimum and maximum fines for various offences.
Recently after GoI enhanced the MV Act penalties, some states intervened to
reduce the penalties.
2. Special Laws (SL) –
Special
Laws are enacted by the legislatures – the Parliament/State legislatures to deal with special offences or
circumstances and may have applicability throughout the country or in a
particular state.
Some
of the SLs having nationwide application
are- The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985, Arms Act, 1959, The Foreigners Act, 1946, Unlawful
Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Anti Hijacking Act 2016, Drugs Control Act
1950, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, The Explosives Act 1884, Fugitive
Economic Offenders Act 2018, Indecent Representation Women Prohibition Act
1986, Prevention Of Corruption Act 1988, The Prevention Of Damage To Public
Property Act 1984, Protection Children Sexual Offences Act 2012, The Protection
Of Women From Domestic Violence Act 2005 etc.
Usually
these legislations, if passed by Parliament, have nationwide applicability.
In some cases, the legislations may provide for the non-applicability of the
legislations to certain areas. In the past, some central legislations did not
apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir and some even to Nagaland. In case of
Nagaland, however, the legislations usually become applicable once approved by
the Nagaland Legislative Assembly as provided for in Article 371A of the Indian
Constitution.
Sometimes,
the Central legislations are also
amended by the States to make the provisions either more strict or lenient as
the case may be, usually stricter. State level amendments in SLs are done
to avoid having to wait eternally for the Parliament to amend the laws every
time there is a requirement – the States
fill in the gaps at their own level.
These
SLs are ‘special and complete codes’ by themselves at times, defining the
offences and the procedures to deal with the offences/ offenders and even the
safeguards for citizens. Usually, SLs
are enacted to deal with special/specific categories of crimes/offences/ circumstances
which are not defined or inadequately defined in the IPC.
Some
SLs like Maharashtra Control Organised Crime Act 1999 (MCOCA) were enacted by
specific states but have been adopted and adapted by other States as well.
Usually
the Special Law provisions are more stringent.
3. Classification based on
seriousness of the offences –
Some
offences are minor while others are serious. Then there are offences which may
not be serious when seen in isolation but may become extremely serious when
either combined with other offences or when committed repeatedly. Therefore there can be circumstances which warrant an
immediate and urgent intervention by the police or others where things can
wait. This is besides the preventive role and detection role of police
where police pro-actively reaches out in the society and tries to root-out
crime and criminals.
The
CrPC uses a specific term for offences which require immediate police
intervention – Cognizable Offence:
"cognizable offence" means
an offence for which, and
"cognizable case" means a case in which, a police officer may, in accordance with the First Schedule or
under any other law for the time being in force, arrest without warrant;
This definition is a mere statement but to decide
whether an offence is cognizable, the police officers reference to the First
Schedule of the CrPC, which classifies the various offences listed/tabulated in
the IPC as either cognizable or non-cognizable. In case of all other Local or SLs, the laws specifically make a mention
of whether all or any of the offences would be cognizable or not. This
classification in the local and SL can be for all offences in that particular
legislation or for all offences separately, individually.
Thus, “Cognizable
Offences are ones where a police officer may, ………….. arrest without warrant.”
A look at the list of cognizable offences in the
CrPC/other statutes, usually, these are the more
serious offences. The logic behind
the classification of offences as cognizable (and hence where police can
arrest without warrant) is that police
needs to act immediately, either to prevent greater harm coming to the society
or the victim or to prevent the accused/suspect from escaping and prejudicing
the course of justice. These are cases where immediate restraint on the
liberty of an individual is the more practical and viable option.
To
clarify things further, the CrPC defines non-cognizable
offences
"non-cognizable offence" means an offence for which, and
"non-cognizable case" means a case in which, a police officer has no
authority to arrest without warrant;
Clearly, in non-cognizable
offences, a police officer has no
authority to arrest without a warrant. These, by implication are matters
where the police does not need to act immediately and, hypothetically, have
adequate time to react - reach out to a
magistrate and obtain a warrant of arrest before taking away the liberty/freedom
of an individual.
This ‘cognizability’ aspect is related to the
most talked about aspect of policing - the First Information Report (FIR).
When any complaint alleging commission
of a cognizable offence is lodged before the O/C of a police station, he has to mandatorily register an FIR – it is a statutory compulsion/duty cast upon
police.
4. Bailable or
Non-Bailable offences –
The
next classification of offences is based on whether the offences are bailable
or not.
"bailable offence" means an offence which is shown as bailable
in the First Schedule, or which is made bailable by any other law for the time
being in force; and non-bailable offence means any other offence;
Law does not define bail but a ‘bailable offence’. The CrPC
has a list of offences which are categorised as bailable or non-bailable.
Similarly, Local and SLs also classify offences as bailable/non-bailable.
Bail
refers to the temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial, with or
without conditions to guarantee his/her appearance in court. Bail is the mechanism/system that governs the status of individuals charged with committing crimes, from the time of their arrest to the time of their trial, and pending appeal, with the major purpose of ensuring their presence at trial.
An accused is innocent until proven guilty.
However, accused or suspect may be arrested during or after the completion of
investigation. This accused, hypothetically, should be held
in the ‘custody’ of the court (jail or judicial custody) until his guilt/innocence
is proved. However, the court has the option
of releasing the person till a final determination on guilt is made. This
option is called bail.
Bailable offences are ones where bail
is almost a matter of ‘absolute right’ and the police official or court has
almost no discretion to withhold grant of bail. In non-bailable offences,
the grant of bail is discretionary.
Bail, is a matter of separate detailed discourse.
Comments
Post a Comment